development

  • I use this docker-based approach.

    0. Create a git repo to test this

    mkdir my-git-project
    cd my-git-project
    git init
    git commit --allow-empty -m"Initialize repo to showcase gitlab-runner locally."
    

    1. Go to your git directory

    cd my-git-project
    

    2. Create a .gitlab-ci.yml

    Example .gitlab-ci.yml

    image: alpine
    
    test:
      script:
        - echo "Hello Gitlab-Runner"
    

    3. Create a docker container with your project dir mounted

    docker run -d \
      --name gitlab-runner \
      --restart always \
      -v $PWD:$PWD \
      -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \
      gitlab/gitlab-runner:latest
    

    4. Execute with

    docker exec -it -w $PWD gitlab-runner gitlab-runner exec docker test
    

    5. Prints

    ...
    Executing "step_script" stage of the job script
    $ echo "Hello Gitlab-Runner"
    Hello Gitlab-Runner
    Job succeeded
    ...
    

    Note: The runner will only work on the commited state of your code base. Uncommited changes will be ignored. Exception: The .gitlab-ci.yml itself must not be commited to be taken into account.

  • _:b0 a <http://schema.org/Book> ;
        <http://schema.org/name> "Semantic Web Primer (First Edition)" ;
        <http://schema.org/offers> _:b1 ;
        <http://schema.org/publisher> "Linked Data Tools" .
    
    _:b1 a <http://schema.org/Offer> ;
        <http://schema.org/price> "2.95" ;
        <http://schema.org/priceCurrency> "USD" .

    Based on this stack overflow answer I created a tool named **oi** that provides some capabilities to convert rdf to json via command line. If no frame is provided via cli, the tool aims to generate @context entries for most situations.

    
    oi -i turtle -t json books.ttl |jq '.["@graph"][0]'
    

    prints

    
    {
      "@id" : "_:b0",
      "@type" : "http://schema.org/Book",
      "name" : "Semantic Web Primer (First Edition)",
      "offers" : {
        "@id" : "_:b1",
        "@type" : "http://schema.org/Offer",
        "price" : "2.95",
        "priceCurrency" : "USD"
      },
      "publisher" : "Linked Data Tools"
    }
    

    The tool attempts to create various output formats. The result is not meant to be 100% correct for each and every case. The overall idea is to provide adhoc conversions just as one step in a conversion pipeline.

    The tool is available as .deb package via it’s github page at: https://github.com/jschnasse/oi.

  • How to create a java command line tool that is (1) easy to install (2) as small as possible (3) and does not interfere with a previously installed jvm on the host?

    Here is my take

    1.  Create an executable ‚fat jar‘
    2.  Create a minimal jvm to run the fat jar
    3.  Define a proper version number
    4.  Package everything together to a .deb package
    5.  Provide the .deb package via an online repository

    All snippes were taken from https://github.com/jschnasse/oi 

    The oi command line app is a very simple conversion tool to transform structured formats from one into another.

    Create an executable ‚fat jar‘

    I use the maven-assembly-plugin for this. Here is the relevant section from my pom.xml.

    <plugin>
            <artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>
            <executions>
              <execution>
                <phase>package</phase>
                <goals>
                  <goal>single</goal>
                </goals>
              </execution>
            </executions>
            <configuration>
              <finalName>oi</finalName>
              <descriptorRefs>
                <descriptorRef>jar-with-dependencies</descriptorRef>
              </descriptorRefs>
              <archive>
                <manifest>
                  <mainClass>org.schnasse.oi.main.Main</mainClass>
                </manifest>
                <manifestEntries>
                  <Automatic-Module-Name>org.schnasse.oi</Automatic-Module-Name>
                </manifestEntries>
              </archive>
              <appendAssemblyId>false</appendAssemblyId>
            </configuration>
          </plugin>
    

    The most important configuration entry is the path to the <mainClass> . The entry points to a java class that must define a main method.

    It also is important to define a fixed <finalName>. We don’t want to create artifacts with version numbers in it. The versioning is done elsewhere. Our build process should just spit out an executable at a predictable location.

    The mvn package command will now create a fat jar under target/oi.jar.

    Create a minimal jvm to run the ‚fat jar‘

    The created jar can be executed as java -jar target/oi.jar. This is already an important milestone since you can now use the app on your own development pc. To make it a bit handier put the actual call into a script and copy it to /usr/bin/oi in order to make it accessible for all users on the development machine. Also you can provide the oi.jar at a more global location, e.g. /usr/lib.

    This could be the content of /usr/bin/oi

    java -jar /usr/lib/oi.jar $@

    Use $@ to pass parameters from command line to the actual java app.

    More on this will be explained in the ‚Package everything together‘ section.

    The next step is to make the program executable on other machines. Since the application depends on the existence of the java interpreter we have to find a way to either ship java  together with our little oi tool or to ask the user/user’s computer to install it in advance.

    Both approaches are feasible. I decided to ship java together with my tool for the following reasons (1) The tool should be as self contained as possible (2) The installation of the tool should not interfere with other java based packages. (3) I want to be free to update to new jvm versions at my own speed, therefore I want  support only one single jvm version at every state of development.

    Today java distributions come with a tool named jlink. The jlinktool can be used to create minimal jvms. This will look like:

    jlink \
        --add-modules java.base,java.naming,java.xml \
        --verbose \
        --strip-debug \
        --compress=1 \
        --no-header-files \
        --no-man-pages \
        --output /opt/jvm_for_oi

    The result is a minimal jvm only containing the modules java.base,java.naming,java.xml under /opt/jvm_for_oi. The idea is now to provide this jvm together with our app. But to become a bit more independent from the configuration of my  development machine I want to guarantee that my tool is served always with a well defined jvm version and not just with the version I have installed at my development machine. To create a well defined build environment I will use docker. With docker I can create a minimal jvm on the basis of a predefined openJDK version. And here is how it works.

    1. Based on the code above we can create a file named Dockerfile.build to create the jvm based on the openJdk-12.0.1_12.

    FROM adoptopenjdk/openjdk12:jdk-12.0.1_12
    RUN jlink \
        --add-modules java.base,java.naming,java.xml \
        --verbose \
        --strip-debug \
        --compress 2 \
        --no-header-files \
        --no-man-pages \
        --output /opt/jvm_for_oi
    

    We will use this docker definition just to create the jvm and copy it to our development environment. The docker image can be deleted directly afterwards.

    docker build -t adopt_jdk_image -f Dockerfile.build .
    docker create --name adopt_jdk_container adopt_jdk_image
    docker cp adopt_jdk_container:/opt/jvm_for_oi /usr/share/jvm_for_oi
    docker rm adopt_jdk_container

    The resulting jvm can be found under /usr/share/jvm_for_oi.

    This again is a very important milestone. You can now edit your startscript at /usr/bin/oi and use the generated jvm instead of your preinstalled java version. This will make the execution of the app independent of the globally installed java version and therefor more reliable.

    /usr/share/jvm_for_oi/bin/java -jar /usr/lib/oi.jar $@

    In my project configuration the inclusion of the minimal jvm increases the size of the .deb package by ~10MB. On the target system the jvm takes ~45MB extra space. In my former setup I configured openJDK-11 as dependency in the Debian package which consumes roughly ~80MB of extra space if newly installed.

    Define a proper version number

    Since oi is a java app built with maven I use the typical semantic versioning scheme which consists of three numbers (1) a  major, (2) a minor, (3 ) and a patch number divided by dots. Example given, a version of ‚0.1.4‘ reads as follows:

    0 – No major version. There is no stable version yet. Development is still at an early stage.

    1 – First minor version. This is software at an very early stage. Usually minor versions are compatible to the recent major release. Since no major version exists this software has no reliable behavior yet.

    4 – There were four patches released for the first minor version. A patch is typically a bug fix that does not change the

    The process of creating  a new version is done as the following. (1) Define the next Version in a variable oi_version stored in a file VERSIONS. (2) Use a script bumpVersions.sh to  update the version numbers in several files like README, manpage, etc. (3) Commit files that were updated with the new version number to git. (4) Use the mvn-gitflow plugin to create new versions for the actual source and to push everything in a well defined manner to github.

    <plugin>
      <groupId>com.amashchenko.maven.plugin</groupId>
      <artifactId>gitflow-maven-plugin</artifactId>
      <version>1.7.0</version>
      <configuration>
        <gitFlowConfig>
            <developmentBranch>master</developmentBranch>
        </gitFlowConfig>
      </configuration>
    </plugin>

    The gitflow-maven-plugin supports the command mvn gitflow:release . The command does the following:

    1. Define a new release number

    2. Update the pom.xml in the development branch accordingly

    3. Push the updated pom.xml to the mainline branch

    4. Create a tag on mainline

    5. Update the release number in the development branch to a new SNAPSHOT release.

    6. Push the updated pom.xml to the development branch.

    The plugin was originally created with for the `gitflow` branching approach. Since my project uses the github-flow-branching approach which does not foresee a development branch besides of the mainline I defined master as development branch.

    Package everything together

    At this point a new release of the sourcecode is online at github. Now, it’s time to create the binary release. The binary release will be a .deb file containing the newly packaged fat-jar together with the minimal jvm. (5) A build.sh script is used to create the .deb artifact.

    #! /bin/bash
    
    scriptdir="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" && pwd )"
    cd $scriptdir
    source VERSIONS
    mvnparam=$1
    
    function build_oi(){
     package_name=$1
     package_version=$2
     package=${package_name}_$package_version
     mkdir -p deb/$package/usr/lib
     mkdir -p deb/$package/usr/bin
     mkdir -p deb/$package/usr/share/man/man1/
     mvn package -D$mvnparam
     sudo cp src/main/resources/$package_name deb/$package/usr/bin
     sudo cp target/$package_name.jar deb/$package/usr/lib
    
    docker build -t adopt_jdk_image -f Dockerfile.build .
    docker create --name adopt_jdk_container adopt_jdk_image
    docker cp adopt_jdk_container:/opt/jvm_for_oi deb/$package/usr/share/jvm_for_oi
    docker rm adopt_jdk_container
    
    ln -s ../share/jvm_for_oi/bin/java deb/$package/usr/bin/jvm_for_oi 
    
    }
    
    function build(){
     package_name=$1
     package_version=$2
     package=${package_name}_$package_version
    
     if [ -d $scriptdir/man/$package_name ]
     then
       cd $scriptdir/man/$package_name
       asciidoctor -b manpage man.adoc
       cd -
       sudo cp $scriptdir/man/$package_name/$package_name.1 deb/$package/usr/share/man/man1/
     fi  
     dpkg-deb --build deb/$package
    }
    
    build_oi oi $oi_version

    What you can see from the listing is that the script creates a directory structure in accordance to the .deb package format. It also generates (1) the fat-jar, (2) the minimal jvm (3) a man page and (4) binds it all together with a dpkg-deb -build command

    Provide the .deb package via an online repository

    (6) The .deb artifact is then uploaded to a bintray repo using again a shell script push_to_bintray.sh.

    #! /bin/bash
    
    scriptdir="$( cd "$( dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" && pwd )"
    source VERSIONS
    
    function push_to_bintray(){
    cd $scriptdir
    PACKAGE=$1
    VERSION=$2
    API_AUTH=$3
    subject=jschnasse
    repo=debian
    filepath=${PACKAGE}_${VERSION}.deb
    curl -u$API_AUTH -XPOST "https://bintray.com/api/v1/packages/$subject/$repo/" -d@bintray/${PACKAGE}/package.json -H"content-type:application/json"
    curl -u$API_AUTH -XPOST "https://bintray.com/api/v1/packages/$subject/$repo/$PACKAGE/versions" -d@bintray/${PACKAGE}/version.json -H"content-type:application/json"
    curl -u$API_AUTH -T deb/$filepath "https://bintray.com/api/v1/content/$subject/$repo/$PACKAGE/$VERSION/$filepath;deb_distribution=buster;deb_component=main;deb_architecture=all;publish=1;override=1;"
    curl -u$API_AUTH -XPUT "https://bintray.com/api/ui/artifact/$subject/$repo/$filepath" -d'{"list_in_downloads":true}' -H"content-type:application/json"
    cd -
    }
    apiauth=$1
    push_to_bintray oi $oi_version $apiauth
    push_to_bintray lscsv $lscsv_version $apiauth
    push_to_bintray libprocname $libprocname_version $apiauth

    The script makes use of a set of prepared json files to provide metadata for the  package.

    (7) The last step is now to visit the github wegpage an navigate to the tag that has been created at step (4). By adding a release name it will become visible as release at the landing page of the git repo.

    Step 6 seems the most critical step since it updates the debian repo and makes the new version available to everyone. In between step 5 and step 6 some sort of testing should happen to ensure that the artifact is installable and does execute as expected. My plan is to utilize a set of docker files to test releases. A first attempt can be found here.

    Fazit

    The process of versioning consists of multiple steps. Most of the work can be automated. A semi automated process can be developed with little effort. To automate the whole process it is crucial to provide well thought tests in between the steps and to define fallback points. This adds some extra safety to the objective but also introduces extra complexity. For future jdk versions it could be beneficial to use jpackager instead of jlink.

     

     

  • Gerrit

    • Progresses commit after commit.
    • Each commit is rebased to the current status of the ‚develop‘ branch.
    • All commits are verified and reviewed.
    • Commits can be changed and overridden during review.
    • Master branch keeps track of releases.

     

    • Tends to result in larger commits.
    • Tends to result in multi-purpose commits
    • Developers are forced to keep track of current development.
    • Only working solutions pass review and become part of the history.

     

    • Local git configuration needed

    Github/Gitlab

    • Changes are provided as MergeRequest/PullRequest for series of commits.
    • Merge Requests are verified and reviewed.
    • Master branch keeps track of current state of development
    • Release-Tags are used to mark certain points in development as release.

     

    • Tends to result in multiple small commits.
    • Tends to result in single purpose commits.
    • Can lead to large changes with the risk of conflicts. Strategies for conflict resolving are needed.
    • Detailed process can vary from repo to repo.
    • Developers must be willing to keep track with current development.
    • It is less common to override commits.  Therefor history tends to become a record of the development process itself.
  • With adhoc rdf generation from various formats.

    less src/test/resources/json/in/rosenmontag.json
    oi src/test/resources/json/in/rosenmontag.json -trdf
    less src/test/resources/yml/in/HT015847062.yml
    oi src/test/resources/yml/in/HT015847062.yml -trdf|less

     

    Install

    wget https://dl.bintray.com/jschnasse/debian/oi_0.4.2.deb
    sudo apt install ./oi_0.4.2.deb #depends on openjdk-11-jre

    https://github.com/jschnasse/oi

  • With pretty rdf printing support.

    cat src/test/resources/rdf/context/stack43638342.rdf.context
    cat src/test/resources/rdf/in/stack43638342.rdf
    oi -i turtle -f src/test/resources/rdf/context/stack43638342.rdf.context src/test/resources/rdf/in/stack43638342.rdf

    Install

    wget https://dl.bintray.com/jschnasse/debian/oi_0.4.2.deb
    sudo apt install ./oi_0.4.2.deb #depends on openjdk-11-jre

    https://github.com/jschnasse/oi

     

  • I always like this practical insights:

    https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2020/11/09/this-is-how-i-git/

    Exclusively use git via console with modified prompt. Same here!

    scm_info(){
        git_info=`git branch 2>/dev/null | sed -e '/^[^*]/d' -e 's/* \(.*\)/\1/'`
      if [ "${git_info}" ]; then
        if [ "$(git status -s)" ]; then
          git_color='\033[1;31m'
        else
          git_color='\033[1;36m'
        fi
        echo -e "${git_color}git:${git_info}"
      fi
    }
    
    PS1='\n\[\033[1;32m\][\w] $(scm_info)\[\033[0m\]\n\$ '
    
    

    My advice for beginners is: 1. Do not hesitate to bring all sort of command line tools into position. Git offers nice tools for many situations but you don’t have to use them all. 2. Branch, Branch, Branch – it will help you to go back.

  • 1. There is only one user interaction – it is called „the Request“. Please forget about GET,POST,PUT,DELETE. It is just „the request“. The request in general is not of your concern. Everything is handled by the framework. You don’t have to write controller code. In fact, you can not! The controller is already there. It is called „FacesServlet“.

    2. The Framework handles all aspects of HTTP with  „the request lifecycle“.

    3. You have to learn the request lifecycle.

    The Request Lifecycle

    1.  User Request goes in.
    2.  FacesServlet (Controller) asks the Facelet(View) to build the view
    3.  The Facelet asks the BackingBean (Model) to provide data, e.g. from database.
    4.  For that the BackingBean often uses additional Beans.
    5.  The Facelet does a „Restore View„. Now the View is up to date. But…. only internally. Nothing is rendered yet because…
    6.  Now the „Apply Request Values“ phase is entered. For that more data is fetched from the BackingBean.  The Request Values are applied. And an „ActionEvent“ is queued.
    7.  Get data from BackingBean to „Process Validations„
    8. Now a „ValueChangeEvent“ is queued. This tells the FacesServlet that something has happend. Please notice, that the Servlet was the thing that originally startet the „postback request“.
    9. FacesServlet. Eventually invokes ValueChangeEvent at the Backing Bean. But wait, first it fetches again the old version of the BackingBean compares it to the new version, and only if changes where detected the „ValueChangeEvent“ is sent.
    10. Now – tada – „Update Model Values“ in the Facelet.
    11. Which then sets the values to the BackingBean. This hopefully applies, and…
    12. now an „ActionEvent“ is invoked by the framework – because something might have happended. This is the point where all sort of registered Listeners are informed and can start running…1,2,3 go!
    13. This also gets noticed by the BackingBean which is now used in a phase named „Obtain Navigation Outcome„. Sure, because after all – how in the world should the controller know what view to render next? No, it is not determined by the controller endpoint, it is determined by a String that is send after each action in the BackingBean. Hopefully the String points to an existing xhtml  page (Facelet)! What should go wrong? Now everything is prepared and….
    14. „Render Response“ is done by the Facelet – No not the one you invoked inititally but the one that referenced by the last action of the BackingBean.
    15. „Generate HTML output“ is sent to FacesServlet
    16. Response is send the user.

    Advantages

    • You can hook additional Beans into every phase and register listeners to the emitted events. This makes the framework very powerful and flexible.
    • The whole thing works heavily with Dependency Injection. You can easily provide different implementations for different contexts. This is especially useful for testing purposes and provides a mechanism to reuse components in different scenarios.
    • You can completely focus on the framework. You don’t have to care about working directly with HTTP or the database. Therefore the application can interact in different scenarios. Components can be reused.

    Disadvantages

    • It is not possible to create a standard HTTP based webapp with the framework.
    • You won’t get citeable and stable URLs. There is only one hard implemented controller endpoint that handles all requests.
    • It is almost not possible to create an app that stays stateless. The result is an application that almost always depends on a server session. This makes the framework susceptible for polluted sessions, dangling sessions and is by principle not thread safe. Programmers really have to take care.
    • The navigation concept is a real mess. It is implicit, not safe and from client perspective unpredictable.
    • It is hard to google. Since JSF can be combined with different implementations CDI, EJB, JPA

     

  • oi 0.3.0 comes with enhanced XML support.

    https://github.com/jschnasse/oi

  • I started a debian repo at bintray, mostly for fun stuff and own usage.  Don’t expect more than random stuff.

    Accept the bintray gpg key.

    curl -sSL \
    'https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x379ce192d401ab61' \
    | sudo apt-key add -
    

    Add my repo

    echo "deb https://dl.bintray.com/jschnasse/debian buster main" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jschnasse.list
    sudo apt update